EO Sacramento · Google Demand Gen · August 2026

Cheap reach.
Expensive leads.

$1,118 put the “Optimize Yourself” event in front of Sacramento-area business owners 66,649 times and pulled 745 people to the landing page. Five of them reached the registration step. The advertising worked. The handoff to registration did not.

CampaignEO Sac – Prospect Event
FlightAug 7 – Aug 28, 2026
Event dateFri, Sept 25, 2026
PlatformGoogle Demand Gen
Prepared byThe Missing Ingredient

The short version. We spent $1,118 over three weeks on Google’s Demand Gen product — ads that run inside YouTube, Gmail and the Google Discover feed. The money bought a lot of qualified attention at a low price: 66,649 ad views and 745 clicks through to the event page, at $1.50 a click. That is a healthy result for cold prospecting.

Only five of those 745 visitors reached the registration step. That is the number the board should focus on, and it is the number with the most fixable causes behind it: a Google policy block on our best-performing ad, six days of the flight with no ads running at all, and a registration form that sits on a different website from the landing page, which means we cannot yet confirm how many people actually finished signing up.

What we spent, what it bought

Every figure below is pulled directly from the Google Ads account for the flight Aug 7–28, 2026. Spend, impressions and clicks are final. The lead count can still move: this conversion carries a 30-day window, so a click from late August could still be credited as late as the end of September.

Total spend
$1,118
Against a $50/day budget over a 22-day flight ($1,100 planned)
Impressions
66,649
Times an ad appeared on someone’s screen · $16.77 per thousand
Video views
2,702
12.2% of video ad appearances became a view · $0.27 per view
Clicks to site
745
1.12% click rate · $1.50 per click
Tracked leads
5
$223.56 each · see the measurement caution below
Days delivered
16 / 22
Six days in the flight served no ads at all
Read this before you read the lead number. The conversion Google counts here is a codeless website conversion — it fires on the event landing page the ads point to. Every “Reserve Your Spot” button on that page hands the visitor to a form on forms.monday.com, a different website that Google's tag does not cover. So 5 is the number of people Google handed to the registration form — not a confirmed count of completed registrations. The true registration count sits in the monday.com form, and the two should be compared before anyone treats $223.56 as the real cost per registration.

What we ran

One campaign, one audience group, five ads. Demand Gen is Google’s social-style product: instead of waiting for someone to search, it places video and image ads inside YouTube, Gmail and Discover for people who match an audience definition.

Setup

WhereSacramento, Placer, El Dorado and Yolo counties
WhoAges 25–54, household income in the top 20% of the area, all genders
InterestsCustom-built audiences around “Business Advice”, “Entrepreneur News” and “Videos About Entrepreneurship”, plus two saved audiences: “EO Prospect” and “EO Cold Audience — Custom Intent + Income”
Budget$50 per day
BiddingMaximise Conversions — Google is told to buy as many form-starts as the budget allows
DestinationGamma event page, then a monday.com registration form

Creative

  • Three video ads built on existing “Because of EO” member testimonials — Sheila Carroll, Mark Haney and Dave Reese — each in full and shortened cuts.
  • Two image ads using event graphics in square, portrait and landscape crops.
  • Five headlines rotated across every ad, mixing a qualifier (“For Sacramento Founders $1M+”) with a health-problem framing (“Your Health Has No Dashboard”).
  • Five descriptions naming the speaker, the venue and the “free for qualified founders” offer.
Why this matters: Google assembles headlines, descriptions, videos and images into combinations on the fly. That is why the report below measures headlines and videos separately from the ads that contain them.

How the money went out

Daily spend and daily impressions across the flight. The gaps are the story.

Impressions Spend
Daily delivery: peak of 20,630 impressions on August 27. Zero delivery on August 16, 17, 21, 22, 23 and 24.
Read: The campaign served on 16 of the 22 days in the flight. It went dark on 16–17 August and again for four straight days, 21–24 August. The account change log records no pause and no budget change on any of those six dates, so the cause sits outside the campaign settings and needs checking with Google. Those six dark days are roughly a quarter of the flight. The strongest delivery came in the final four days, exactly when the campaign was switched off.

Which creative worked

Two honest framings, because they point in different directions.

Video versus image

Format Spend Impressions Cost per 1,000 Clicks Click rate Leads
Video (3 ads) $725.0622,101$32.81 2441.10%4
Image (2 ads) $392.7244,548$8.82 5011.12%1
Total $1,117.7866,649$16.77 7451.12%5
Read: Image ads were nearly four times cheaper to show — $8.82 to reach a thousand screens against $32.81 for video — and they carried two thirds of the total reach on a third of the budget. Video cost more but produced four of the five leads. In short: images buy awareness cheaply, video moves people to act. A future campaign should run both and stop asking them to do the same job.

Ad by ad

Ad Spend Impressions Clicks Click rate Leads Status
Video — Sheila Carroll $307.309,49097 1.02%2 Disapproved
Video — Mark Haney $263.137,19281 1.13%2 Best all-round
Image set A $213.0435,203381 1.08%0 Reach engine
Image set B $179.689,345120 1.28%1 Best click rate
Video — Dave Reese $154.635,41966 1.22%0
Read: The two testimonial videos that named a recognisable local founder — Sheila Carroll and Mark Haney — took half the budget and produced four of the five leads. Image set A was the reach engine: 35,203 impressions, more than half the campaign total, for $213. Nothing here separates the ads by a wide enough margin to call a clear winner on leads alone; with five leads across five ads, one extra lead would reorder the table.

Which message pulled

Impressions served
Impressions by headline: For Sacramento Founders $1M+ 45,343; Free Founder Event Sept 25 9,145; Your Health Has No Dashboard 5,154; You Track Every KPI But One 3,968; A Founder Who Exited On Health 3,041.
HeadlineImpressionsClicksClick rateLeads
For Sacramento Founders $1M+45,3434551.00%1
Free Founder Event, Sept 259,1451451.59%1
Your Health Has No Dashboard5,154651.26%3
You Track Every KPI But One3,968531.34%0
A Founder Who Exited, On Health3,041270.89%0
Read: Google chose to show “For Sacramento Founders $1M+” in 68% of all impressions, and at 1.00% it clicked below the campaign average of 1.12% and below three of the other four headlines. The two headlines that framed the event as a health problem — “Your Health Has No Dashboard” and “You Track Every KPI But One” — got a fraction of the airtime and beat it on clicks, and the first of them carried three of the five leads. The qualifier headline is doing filtering work, not persuasion work. Next time, split them so the machine cannot put two thirds of the budget behind the weaker message.

Who we actually reached

The targeting said ages 25–54 in the top income bracket. Here is who the money found.

By age

Spend Age unknown Excluded from targeting
Spend by age: 18-24 excluded; 25-34 $164; 35-44 $346; 45-54 $589; 55-64 and 65+ excluded; age unknown $19.
Read: The 45–54 band absorbed 53% of the budget and clicked at 1.29%, well clear of the two younger bands, which were level with each other at about 1.01%. Leads were flat across the top two bands (two each), so this is a click-rate signal, not a lead signal. Ages 18–24, 55–64 and 65+ were deliberately excluded, so they received nothing. The band directly above the best-performing one is the obvious gap to test. A further $18.86 went to people whose age Google could not determine.

By gender and device

SegmentSpendClicksLeads
Men$706.594965
Women$391.812380
Unknown$19.38110
Mobile phone$991.026804
Desktop$98.46370
Tablet$28.29281
Read: 89% of the budget went to mobile phones, which is normal for YouTube and Discover. It also means the event page and the registration form were judged almost entirely on a phone screen. Men took 63% of the spend and all five leads; women took 35% of the spend and none. Five leads is far too small a sample to conclude women are not interested — but it is large enough to be worth watching in the next flight.

What we learned

Five things that shaped this result, ordered by how much they cost us.

  1. Google blocked our biggest-spending ad over the landing pageFix before next flight

    The Sheila Carroll video ad — which took the largest share of the budget and tied for the most leads — is currently disapproved by Google under its “unapproved substances” policy. The trigger was not the ad. It was the event landing page, which named three specific peptides (Epitalon, GHK-CU and BPC-157). Google treats named peptides as unapproved substances and restricts any ad pointing at a page that lists them.

    The page as it stands today no longer names those compounds; it discusses peptides only as a topic. The ad is still blocked. Action: resubmit the ad for review now the page has changed, and keep specific compound names off any page an ad points to.

  2. A quarter of the flight served nothingInvestigate

    Six of the 22 days delivered zero impressions: 16–17 August, and four consecutive days from 21–24 August. The account change log records no pause and no budget change on those dates, which rules out a manual switch-off. That leaves a billing or account-level cause, and it needs to be confirmed with Google before the next campaign.

    The money was not lost — the continuity was. Google made up the shortfall by spending harder on the days it did run, so the campaign still spent $1,117.78 against a $1,100 plan. What we lost is three weeks of steady presence: a prospect who saw the ad on a Friday saw nothing for the next four days. For a campaign whose entire job is repeated exposure ahead of a dated event, that pattern costs more than the dollars suggest.

  3. We stopped four weeks before the eventPlan differently

    The campaign ended on 28 August. The event is on 25 September. The last four days of the flight were also the strongest — 27 August alone delivered 20,630 impressions, nearly a third of the campaign total, as Google's bidding finally found its footing. Demand Gen campaigns need roughly two weeks to learn before they perform, and this one was switched off just as it started to work.

  4. We cannot yet count real registrationsFix the tracking

    The conversion Google reports is a codeless tag on the event landing page, not on the monday.com form where people actually register. Google therefore counts the handoff, not the finish. Until a tracking tag sits on the monday.com confirmation step, the cost per registration is unknown — it could be better than $223.56 or much worse. This is the single highest-value fix on the list, because every future decision depends on it.

  5. The advertising itself performed wellKeep

    A 1.12% click rate and a $1.50 cost per click on cold prospecting audiences are solid numbers for this product. The audience build — four counties, top-20% income, entrepreneurship interests — found the right kind of person cheaply. The problem in this campaign was not buying attention. It was what happened after the click.

What we would do next time

MoveWhy
Track the registration form itselfPut a conversion tag on the monday.com confirmation page so we count finished registrations, not clicks toward them. Everything else is guesswork until this is done.
Run to within a week of the eventThis campaign stopped 28 days out, right as delivery peaked. Event registration concentrates in the final fortnight.
Keep compound names off the landing pageOne naming choice on a Gamma page cost us our best ad. Discuss peptides as a topic; do not list them.
Split image and video into separate budgetsImages bought reach at $8.82 per thousand; video produced the leads at $32.81. Pooled together, they compete for the same money and neither is optimised.
Test the 55–64 age band45–54 was the best-clicking band by a clear margin. The band directly above it was excluded, so we have no read on it at all — and it is where established founders sit. Worth a test, not an assumption.
Retire the qualifier headline as a lead message“For Sacramento Founders $1M+” took 68% of impressions and clicked below the campaign average. The health-problem framing outperformed it on a fraction of the airtime.

For context: the June campaign

EO Sacramento ran an earlier Demand Gen campaign from 10 June on a $10 daily budget. It spent $727 and delivered 66,873 impressions and 966 clicks — a 1.44% click rate against August’s 1.12%. It is not a like-for-like comparison: that campaign was set to chase YouTube channel subscriptions, and it recorded 458 of them. Subscriptions are an engagement signal, not event leads, so the two campaigns cannot be judged against each other on cost per lead. Together they show the same pattern: this audience is cheap to reach and responsive to EO content.

How to read this

Demand Gen
Google's social-style advertising product. Ads appear inside YouTube, Gmail and the Google Discover feed, shown to people who match an audience definition rather than to people who searched for something.
Impression
One appearance of an ad on one person's screen. Not a unique person — the same person seeing the ad three times counts as three impressions.
Cost per thousand (CPM)
What it costs to put the ad on screen a thousand times. The standard way to compare the price of reach between formats.
Click rate (CTR)
Clicks divided by impressions. For cold Demand Gen prospecting, anything above roughly 1% is a working ad.
Conversion / lead
Here, one recorded arrival at the registration step on the event landing page. See the caution at the top of this report — it is not a confirmed registration.
Why the creative numbers do not add up neatly
Google builds each ad on the fly from a pool of headlines, descriptions, videos and images. An impression is credited to every asset that appeared in it. So headline impressions total the campaign, but description and image totals do not, because not every layout shows every element.
A word on sample size
Five leads is a very small number. It is enough to say the campaign under-produced leads. It is not enough to prove which headline, video or audience caused it. Every creative conclusion in this report should be treated as a hypothesis to test in the next flight, not a settled finding.